Articles Posted in Uncategorized

Published on:

by

This is an uncontested proceeding to probate a copy of the last will and testament of the decedent. The will is dated March 2, 1981, the original of which cannot be located; the decedent died April 4, 1981. The petitioner is the decedent’s daughter-in-law, the surviving spouse of the decedent’s post-deceased son. At the time of her death in 1981, the decedent’s only distributees were her son and her estranged spouse. She resided in a house owned by her estranged spouse. The decedent’s only asset was a home on the same block which was then occupied by the son and his family. The propounded instrument leaves the entire estate to her son. Petitioner alleges that after the decedent’s death, the son advised her that the decedent had left the residence in which they were residing to him. She also claims that she was not aware that any steps needed to be taken regarding the property until after the son’s death in April 2005, when she attempted to place the house on the market for sale.

A waiver and consent has been filed by the executor of the estate of the decedent, decedent’s estranged spouse who post-deceased the decedent. A renunciation and waiver and consent have also been filed by the son of petitioner and decedent’s son.

Pursuant to SCPA 1407, a lost or destroyed will or codicil may be admitted to probate only upon establishing: (1) that the will has not been revoked; (2) proper execution; and (3) the provisions of the missing will. It appears that the execution of the original instrument was supervised by an attorney permitting the inference that the statutory requirements were met (Matter of Spinello, 291 AD2d 406 [2002]), thus satisfying the requirement of proof of due execution. The court is further satisfied that the original instrument’s provisions have been established by a photocopy which is a true and complete copy of the original instrument as executed (SCPA 1407[3]).

Continue reading

by
Posted in: and
Published on:
Updated:
Published on:

by

A New York Probate Lawyer said the petitioner moves for summary judgment on her entitlement to take an elective share of the decedent’s estate pursuant to EPTL 5-1.1-A. In opposition, respondents, the coexecutors of the estate, argue the motion is premature as no discovery has been conducted, and there are material and triable issues of fact raised by their counterclaims and defenses.

A Kings Estate attorney said that respondents filed a verified answer alleging various affirmative defenses1 and counterclaims seeking to: (1) have the alleged marriage between the decedent and petitioner deemed null and void ab initio, and to annul the marriage nunc pro tunc; (2) dismiss the petition in its entirety; (3) vacate petitioner’s notice of election dated October 26, 2006; and (4) award the estate damages for the costs of this proceeding. Alternatively, if petitioner is not disqualified as a surviving spouse, they seek an award of compensatory damages equal to the elective share, plus interest and costs of the proceeding for the loss to the estate resulting from petitioner’s fraudulent conduct.

A New York Estate Lawyer said the decedent died on June 16, 2006, survived by two sons, the coexecutors herein, and four grandchildren from a prior marriage. Petitioner served as the decedent’s caretaker during the last decade of his life. The decedent’s will dated July 10, 1982, was admitted to probate on October 30, 2006. Letters testamentary were issued to the nominated coexecutors on that date. The decedent’s children and grandchildren were the sole beneficiaries under the will. The record reflects that a notice of election dated October 26, 2006 was timely filed by petitioner, and was properly served upon the coexecutors.

Continue reading

by
Posted in:
Published on:
Updated:
Published on:

by

This is a probate matter which comes on by motion of petitioner following the suspension of a hearing pursuant to SCPA 1404 held at the law office of respondent’s attorney by agreement of the parties.

A New York Probate lawyer said that Petitioner requests three substantive orders related to the examination of witnesses before resuming the hearing: (1) to continue the hearing at the County Courthouse under the supervision of the Surrogate or other designee; (2) permission to question witnesses regarding events prior to the three-year period before the date the propounded instrument was executed; (3) that the witness and the attorney who drafted the decedent’s last three wills, fully produce all of his files relating to the three wills, the last of which is the propounded will, including files dated prior to the three-year period from the date the propounded instrument was executed.

Petitioner alleges that the decedent, who died on August 31, 2003, had made three wills, all with different or differing provisions as to the disbursement of his estate.

Continue reading

by
Posted in:
Published on:
Updated:
Published on:

by

A son from California filed for an order dismissing the pending proceeding to probate his mother’s New York Will that raises an interesting question of jurisdiction. The son argues the jurisdiction of the court to prove the validity of the Will of a non-residence which requests New York to prove valid and invokes New York law on the ground that her French legal residency has assumed jurisdiction over her estate. The motion is opposed by the Petitioners in the proceeding, the co-executors named in the Will, who are presently serving as preliminary executors.

The mother who made the Will was born a French citizen in 1899, and she became a naturalized United States citizen. She was a New York resident for about thirty years. For approximately seven years she was employed in the law offices in New York City. During this period she worked as secretary to one of that firm’s senior partners. A lawyer-client relationship with that firm also commenced during that time. The French Ordinary Residence Card issued indicates that the mother who made the Will stated that she returned to France on October 24, 1971.

A New York Probate Lawyer said the Will which is the subject of the jurisdictional attack was drafted by the firm in New York she worked for. It was allegedly executed by the deceased in the firm’s Paris office in 1972, and there is no challenge on the matter. Both the petitioners and the son refer to the 1972 document as the New York Will. Both sides seemingly agree that this Will, whether admitted to be proven valid in New York or established in accordance with French law, governs at most the property of the deceased mother which was physically located in New York when she died, and that it does not affect property actually located in France, which passes under the French Will.

Continue reading

by
Posted in:
Published on:
Updated:
Published on:

by

The Tax Act of 2010 put in to play a lot of changes for people, especially the wealthy, said a New York Estate Planning Lawyer. Those that had any significant wealth in their estate planning process wanted to make some donations before 2011. The initial tax on estate planning gifts was set to go up, but at the last minute President Obama signed an extension of the Act which allowed for lower tax rates for an additional two years.

While the Tax Act of 2010 has a lot of wealthy people breathing a sigh of relief, others aren’t so much. Those who followed estate planning advice and took advantage of the tax rates at 35% before 2011 are suddenly sorry they took that advice. While getting your gifts out ahead of the new tax law seemed smart, now it doesn’t. Before the Act was signed, they were allowed gifts of up to $1 million dollars without heavy taxation. After the Act and through 2012, that gift is $5 million dollars, said a New York Estate Planning Attorney.

Some gift givers feel like they were slighted and want their estate planning money back, so they can “re-do” the gift. Some feel like they gave it away too early, or might not have given it away if they had known the tax breaks would be extended. The NYork Estate Planning Lawyers and experts did not know that the President would be making an extension until shortly before it happened, well after they had already doled out advice to hundreds and thousands of people.

by
Posted in:
Published on:
Updated:
Published on:

by

Attempts to settle allegations between a 94-year-old’s new wife and the rest of his family have failed.

A lawsuit was filed against the San Antonio businessman’s new wife and a lawyer November 2009. The $15 millionaire died August 31, 2009 in his home. Family members have been asking questions that no one seems to know the answers to.

The dead businessman’s sister and her two children filed the suit after they found they would not receive any of their inheritance. Until several months after the man’s marriage, the man’s estate would have been divided between the three of them, expressed a New York Estate Planning Lawyer.

Continue reading

by
Posted in:
Published on:
Updated:
Published on:

by

There were some new estate planning laws that were recorded in the books just before the year 2010 ended, says a New York Estate Planning Lawyer. Some experts in the estate planning field say they are ridiculous and should be taken back off the books because they have a great potential to be abused. Then there are the people who think the new laws are fine and that with certain checks in place, they cannot be abused. So, what are these new estate planning laws?

The dollar amounts for certain tax rates were decreased substantially. The old limit was $1 million dollars or more and the person was taxed at a rate of 35%. The new limit is raised all the way up to $5 million dollars before the 35% tax rate has to be paid on the sum. A $4 million dollar increase means that people can leave their heirs a substantial amount of money and not have to worry over paying the taxes on it when they receive it, according to a New York Estate Planning Lawyer.

However, the new rules also state that this is temporary. Why? To give Americans a tax break during an economic crisis. The rules were made so that the government took less money in hopes that it would be circulated out in to the economy. Any boost in the economy is a good thing, even if it is one person shopping at a time. The temporary estate planning rule is good for 2011 and 2012, says a New York Estate Planning Lawyer. There is a chance that the rules could be extended out further if the economy still does not improve.

by
Posted in:
Published on:
Updated:
Published on:

by

If you are a single person, then you might need to change how you have your estate distributed for the future, says a New York Estate Planning Attorney. New laws went in to affect that change the rules for 2011 and 2012 when it comes to estate and gift taxes. The changes are beneficiary to the person receiving the benefits, so it will be worth your while to update what you have already done in regards to your estate or get moving on one today for the future.

Even without children or a spouse, single people should have their estate matters in order in the event of an emergency or accident, according to a NYC Estate Planning Lawyer. An accident can happen at any time, so being prepared is the best bet. If a lawyer has handled your estate planning, then there shouldn’t be anything to worry about in the event of an unfortunate incident. If your matters are handled ahead of time, it might also reduce the chances of a squabble taking place between relatives who might inherit since there are no children or a spouse.

The new rules for exemptions in 2011 state that federal gifts won’t be taxed at the 35% rate until they are over $5 million dollars, says a New York Estate Planning Lawyer. The previous rate was $1 million. The new rules mean that family members can receive more while staying at a lower tax level. It is suggested that while estate planning for the future, money is given away to charities to lower the net worth of the estate and to try and lessen the tax burden left on those who are inheriting the fortune.

by
Posted in:
Published on:
Updated:
Published on:

by

A new bill being introduced in Massachusetts gives people who love their pets a way to legally care for them after they die, according to a New York City Estate Planning Lawyer. Massachusetts is one of only 7 states in the US that, until now, had no such provisions made for people to leave trust funds to their pets should the owners die before their beloved animals. Now, that is all about to change. 

A New York Estate Planning Lawyer revealed, the previous bill required that the owners of the pets left the money to the people whom they selected to care for the animals, which essentially allowed them to spend the money on anything that they wanted. This new bill, however, names the animals themselves. 

High profile cases of excessive money being left to pets, such as when Leona Helmsley left $12 million to her lapdog, Trouble, have given the impression that these laws are silly or meant only for wealthy people to find a place to stash their money, said the New York Estate Planning Lawyer. But the truth is that people love their pets as much as they love their children and they want to have them cared for should something happen to them. 

Horses, for instance, are expensive to maintain and require a lot of food and other resources, added the New York Estate Planning Lawyer. No worthwhile pet owner would want to leave their precious animals to be sent to shelters to eventually die because no one can afford to keep them. Advocates of this bill say that it is a step in the right direction and is going a long way to encourage the safety and respectful treatment of companion animals. 

Pets play an important role in the lives of our families. A New York Estate Planning Attorney can assist you in making sure that your pets are cared for once you are gone. Call a New York Estate Planning Attorney today and find out about options for pet trusts and guardians.

Stephen Bilkis & Associates has caring New York Probate Lawyers that can help you plan your estate. Our New York Probate Lawyers can help you probate an estate, write a will or set up a trust. We have convenient offices in New York City, Brooklyn, Queens, Bronx, Suffolk and Nassau County. We want to help you through what may be a difficult time with as little problems as possible and offer a free consultation at 1-800-NYNY-LAW (1-800-696-9529). Call us today to take advantage of this free consultation and speak to a New York Probate Lawyer from our firm.

by
Posted in:
Published on:
Updated:
Published on:

by

Over the years the institution of marriage has come under fire in a million ways. Marriage has become an accessory and not a commitment between two people to forge their lives together, come what may. For many of us, that way of thinking disappeared when we saw our own parents struggle and divorce, reports a New York Estate Planning Lawyer. Many people today have no reference point as to what a good, strong marriage even looks like, and so it is becoming obsolete. 

Even so, married couples still enjoy a greater degree of stability in finances, notes the New York Estate Planning Lawyer, because of social security benefits and health insurance, among other things. A former spouse can collect social security on their ex if they were married for at least ten years, according to the New York Estate Planning Lawyer, which makes it obvious that giving a marriage more than a year or two to grow and evolve is a great idea, especially if there are children involved. 

Being married has other advantages, too, added the New York Estate Planning Lawyer, including the combined finances which can result in tax breaks. Perhaps the real benefits of marriage, however, aren’t the financial ones. A good marriage is a journey between two people and offers a totally unique opportunity for both individuals to get to know each other as they truly get to know themselves. As a result of all that growing, the combined interests that two people have in building a life for themselves can change things exponentially.  

Planning for your family’s future is an important step in any marriage. Call a New York Estate Planning Attorney today and begin building a future for your family. A New York Estate Planning Attorney can help you make the right decisions for the ones you love.

The law offices of Stephen Bilkis & Associates has caring New York Probate Lawyers that can help you plan your estate. Our New York Probate Lawyers can help you probate an estate, write a will or set up a trust. We have convenient offices in New York City, Brooklyn, Queens, Bronx, Suffolk and Nassau County. We want to help you through what may be a difficult time with as little problems as possible and offer a free consultation at 1-800-NYNY-LAW (1-800-696-9529). Call us today to take advantage of this free consultation and speak to a New York Probate Lawyer from our firm.

by
Posted in:
Published on:
Updated:
Contact Information